CN-115408852-B - Method, equipment and storage medium for evaluating system capacity contribution degree under combined constraint

CN115408852BCN 115408852 BCN115408852 BCN 115408852BCN-115408852-B

Abstract

The invention discloses a system capacity contribution degree assessment method, equipment and storage medium under combination constraint, wherein the method comprises the steps of determining members to be assessed in a system, obtaining a plurality of capacity combinations related to the members to be assessed, obtaining capacity values of each capacity in the capacity combinations when the members to be assessed are contained and recorded as first capacity values, and capacity values of each capacity in the capacity combinations after the members to be assessed are removed and recorded as second capacity values, determining a first evaluation value containing the capacity combinations when the members to be assessed according to the plurality of first capacity values, determining a second evaluation value of the capacity combinations after the members to be assessed are removed according to the plurality of second capacity values, and determining the contribution degree of the members to be assessed to the system capacity according to the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value. The invention considers the interaction between the capabilities, evaluates the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system from the effect of the actual exertion of the capabilities, and has more accurate evaluation result.

Inventors

LIU JUNXIAN
CHEN TAO
ZHANG XIAOXUE
ZHANG MENGMENG
CHEN HONGHUI
LUO XUESHAN
REN BANGBANG
XU CHENGTAO
SHU ZHEN

Assignees

中国人民解放军国防科技大学
中国人民解放军国防科技大学

Dates

Publication Date: 20260421
Application Date: 20220829
Priority Date: 20220829

Claims (6)

1. The system capacity contribution degree evaluation method under the combined constraint is characterized by comprising the following steps of: determining members to be evaluated in a system, wherein the system is a combat system, and the members to be evaluated are combat equipment; Acquiring a plurality of capability combinations associated with the member to be evaluated, wherein the capability combinations are a set formed by a group of capabilities with influence dependency relationships for realizing the same task; the capacity value of each capacity in the capacity combination is recorded as a first capacity value, and the capacity value of each capacity in the capacity combination is recorded as a second capacity value after the members to be evaluated are removed; Determining a first evaluation value of the capability combination when the member to be evaluated is contained according to the first capability values, and determining a second evaluation value of the capability combination after the member to be evaluated is removed according to the second capability values; determining the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system capacity according to the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value, wherein the contribution degree specifically comprises the following steps: Determining the capacity level integrated value of all the capacities when the member to be evaluated is contained according to the first evaluation value, and recording the capacity level integrated value as a first capacity level integrated value; determining the capacity level comprehensive value of all the capacities when the members to be evaluated are removed according to the second evaluation value, and recording the capacity level comprehensive value as a second capacity level comprehensive value; Determining the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system capacity according to the first capacity level integrated value and the second capacity level integrated value; And determining a comprehensive value of the capacity level of all the capacities when the member to be evaluated is contained according to the first evaluation value, and recording the comprehensive value as a first comprehensive value of the capacity level, wherein the comprehensive value specifically comprises the following steps: Determining the first capacity level integrated value according to a first formula: In the formula, For the first capability level integrated value, For the i-th capability of the system, As a total number of capabilities, To include the capability level value of the ith capability at the time of the member to be evaluated, Is the weight of the ith capability; And determining the comprehensive value of the capacity level of all the capacity after eliminating the member to be evaluated according to the second evaluation value, and recording the comprehensive value as the second comprehensive value of the capacity level, wherein the comprehensive value specifically comprises the following steps: Determining the second capacity level integrated value according to a second formula, wherein the second formula is: In the formula, For said second capability level integrated value, For the i-th capability of the system, As a total number of capabilities, To reject the capability level value of the ith capability at the time of the member to be evaluated, Is the weight of the ith capability; The said Determining according to a third formula, wherein the third formula is as follows: In the formula, Is that All inclusion capabilities of (a) Is a subset of the combination of capabilities of (a), A first evaluation value that is a capability combination cb; The said Determining according to a fourth formula, wherein the fourth formula is as follows: In the formula, Is that All inclusion capabilities of (a) Is a subset of the combination of capabilities of (a), A second evaluation value for the capability combination cb.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a first evaluation value of the capability combination when the member to be evaluated is included based on a plurality of the first capability values, and determining a second evaluation value of the capability combination after the member to be evaluated is removed based on a plurality of the second capability values, specifically comprises: When the short-plate strategy is adopted, the first evaluation value is determined according to a fifth formula, wherein the fifth formula is as follows: In the formula, As the first evaluation value, there is provided, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, Is the first capability value; when the short-plate strategy is adopted, the second evaluation value is determined according to a sixth formula: In the formula, As the second evaluation value, a second evaluation value, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, Is the second capability value.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a first evaluation value of the capability combination when the member to be evaluated is included based on a plurality of the first capability values, and determining a second evaluation value of the capability combination after the member to be evaluated is removed based on a plurality of the second capability values, specifically comprises: when the mean value strategy is adopted, the first evaluation value is determined according to a seventh formula, wherein the seventh formula is as follows: In the formula, As the first evaluation value, there is provided, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, For the value of the first capability it is said, Is that The total number of capabilities in the corresponding capability combination; when the mean value strategy is adopted, the second evaluation value is determined according to an eighth formula, wherein the eighth formula is as follows: In the formula, As the second evaluation value, a second evaluation value, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, For the value of the second capability it is said, Is that The total number of capabilities in the corresponding capability combination.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a first evaluation value of the capability combination when the member to be evaluated is included based on a plurality of the first capability values, and determining a second evaluation value of the capability combination after the member to be evaluated is removed based on a plurality of the second capability values, specifically comprises: when a compromise strategy is adopted, the first evaluation value is determined according to a ninth formula, wherein the ninth formula is: In the formula, As the first evaluation value, there is provided, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, For the value of the first capability it is said, To compromise parameters; When a compromise strategy is adopted, the second evaluation value is determined according to a tenth formula: In the formula, As the second evaluation value, a second evaluation value, In order for the ability to be provided, In order for the combination of capabilities to be made, For the value of the second capability it is said, To compromise parameters.
5. A terminal device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor implements the steps of the method according to any of claims 1 to 4 when the computer program is executed.
6. A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program, which when executed by a processor performs the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Description

Method, equipment and storage medium for evaluating system capacity contribution degree under combined constraint Technical Field The invention belongs to the field of system contribution evaluation, and particularly relates to a system capacity contribution evaluation method, equipment and a storage medium under a combined constraint condition. Background With the gradual transition of modern war forms to informationized war, various weaponry and combat systems form a combat system to fight through information interaction and cooperation, and the combat system is not fight between single combat forces or military arms. Aiming at the requirements of development and construction of a combat system, the contribution degree of the system is used as an important auxiliary decision basis for development planning and construction of weapon equipment, combat system and the like, can provide data analysis support for national defense and military decision problems, and plays a key role in promoting the scientific development of the combat system. The system contribution degree evaluation refers to the measurement of the influence of combat system members on the system capacity. In the prior art, when calculating the contribution degree of the system members, the most direct method is to use the task as the center, namely, evaluate the contribution degree according to the role of the system members in the combat task. However, this approach presents a significant challenge in terms of which tasks are selected as the evaluation context and how to define the scope of the evaluation problem. The system members of the class usually have obvious effects on a small number of tasks, and the selected tasks are directly related to the final evaluation result, so that the selected task set is not greatly related to the system members to be evaluated, and the evaluation result is meaningless. Even if the selected task set is closely related to the system members, the evaluation result is also influenced by factors such as a battle environment, a battle opponent and the like when the task is executed, and is also influenced by factors such as a command mode, a command system, information guarantee, cooperation force and the like, if the amplitude of the final evaluation result change caused by the change of the factors exceeds the amplitude of the influence of the system members to be evaluated, the contribution degree of the system members to be evaluated is submerged in huge noise influenced by various uncertain factors, and the evaluation result loses value. Disclosure of Invention The invention provides a system capacity contribution degree evaluation method, equipment and a storage medium under combined constraint, which are used for solving the problem of inaccurate evaluation results when contribution degree evaluation is performed by taking a task as a center in the prior art. The first aspect of the present disclosure discloses a method for evaluating a system capability contribution under a combined constraint, including: Determining members to be evaluated in a system; Acquiring a plurality of capability combinations associated with the member to be evaluated, wherein the capability combinations are a set formed by a group of capabilities with strong influence dependency relationship for realizing the same task; the capacity value of each capacity in the capacity combination is recorded as a first capacity value, and the capacity value of each capacity in the capacity combination is recorded as a second capacity value after the members to be evaluated are removed; Determining a first evaluation value of the capability combination when the member to be evaluated is contained according to the first capability values, and determining a second evaluation value of the capability combination after the member to be evaluated is removed according to the second capability values; and determining the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system capacity according to the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value. Preferably, determining the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system capability according to the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value specifically includes: Determining the capacity level integrated value of all the capacities when the member to be evaluated is contained according to the first evaluation value, and recording the capacity level integrated value as a first capacity level integrated value; determining the capacity level comprehensive value of all the capacities when the members to be evaluated are removed according to the second evaluation value, and recording the capacity level comprehensive value as a second capacity level comprehensive value; And determining the contribution degree of the member to be evaluated to the system capacity according to the first capacity level integrated value and the second capacity level integrated va