CN-121998468-A - Method, management method, device and system for evaluating reliability of personnel inside physical protection

CN121998468ACN 121998468 ACN121998468 ACN 121998468ACN-121998468-A

Abstract

The invention discloses a method, a device and a system for evaluating the reliability of personnel in a real object protection, wherein the method comprises the steps of obtaining an index system for evaluating the reliability of the personnel, carrying out pairwise comparison on N personnel evaluation dimensions to evaluate the relative importance degree between the dimensions to obtain a first judgment matrix, carrying out pairwise comparison on a plurality of reliability elements in each personnel evaluation dimension to evaluate the relative importance degree between the elements to obtain a second judgment matrix, determining a first weight of each personnel evaluation dimension according to the first judgment matrix, determining a second weight of each reliability element according to the second judgment matrix, determining element scores of each reliability element according to personnel information of the personnel to be evaluated, determining dimension risk values of the personnel evaluation dimensions according to the element scores and the second weights of the personnel evaluation dimensions, and determining the reliability risk values of the personnel to be evaluated according to the dimension risk values and the first weight of the personnel evaluation dimensions. The evaluation accuracy is improved.

Inventors

ZHU YANWEI
REN XIAOFEI
SUN XIAOJING
JIAO HUANHUAN
YAN MIN
LEI RUIPING
YAO ZHENGGANG
XIAO ZHENXIA

Assignees

中国核电工程有限公司

Dates

Publication Date: 20260508
Application Date: 20251205

Claims (10)

1. The method for evaluating the reliability of the personnel inside the physical protection is characterized by comprising the following steps of: Acquiring an index system of personnel reliability evaluation, wherein the index system comprises a reliability risk value and N personnel evaluation dimensions, each personnel evaluation dimension comprises a plurality of reliability elements, and N is a positive integer; The N personnel evaluation dimensions are subjected to pairwise contrast evaluation to evaluate the relative importance degree between the dimensions, so as to obtain a first judgment matrix, and the reliability elements in each personnel evaluation dimension are subjected to pairwise contrast evaluation to evaluate the relative importance degree between the elements, so as to obtain a second judgment matrix, The first judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation between the personnel evaluation dimensions of the criterion layer, and the second judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation of each reliability element in the personnel evaluation dimensions of the reliability element; Determining a first weight of each person assessment dimension according to the first judgment matrix, and determining a second weight of each reliability element according to the second judgment matrix; determining element scores of all reliability elements according to personnel information of personnel to be evaluated; Determining a dimension risk value of the personnel assessment dimension according to the element score and the second weight of each reliability element; and determining the reliability risk value of the personnel to be evaluated according to the dimension risk value of each personnel evaluation dimension and the first weight.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing the pairwise comparison of the N human evaluation dimensions to evaluate the relative importance between the dimensions to obtain a first judgment matrix specifically includes: Step 1, comparing the N personnel evaluation dimensions in pairs, and obtaining importance degree values of each personnel evaluation dimension relative to other personnel evaluation dimensions according to a nine-minute scale method; Step 2, generating an initial judgment matrix according to the importance value corresponding to each personnel evaluation dimension; step 3, carrying out consistency verification on the initial judgment matrix to obtain a consistency ratio; And 4, under the condition that the consistency ratio is higher than a preset threshold value, re-executing the steps 1 to 3 until the consistency ratio is lower than or equal to the preset threshold value, and determining the initial judgment matrix as the first judgment matrix, wherein the first judgment matrix is a positive and reciprocal matrix.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein determining a first weight for each of the person assessment dimensions according to the first judgment matrix comprises: Weighting the first judgment matrix by adopting a feature vector method to obtain a feature vector corresponding to the dominant direction; And carrying out normalization processing on the feature vectors to obtain first weights of the evaluation dimensions of all the personnel.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the element score of each reliability element according to the personnel information of the personnel to be evaluated specifically comprises: Assigning a score to each reliability element by using a grading and quantifying scoring rule to obtain element scores of the reliability elements, Wherein the scoring rules are constructed based on expert rules libraries and/or historical event data.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the N personnel assessment dimensions comprise: at least one dimension of the five dimensions of personnel basic condition, thought condition, health condition, work performance and social relationship; wherein personnel basic conditions include, but are not limited to, age, work age, post sensitivity, and qualification; Ideological conditions include, but are not limited to, value-viewing stability, discipline, and risk preferences; health conditions include, but are not limited to, physical and mental health indicators, sleep and stress states; Work performance includes, but is not limited to, performance levels, violation or anomaly records, leave and overtime laws; Social relationships include, but are not limited to, sensitivity to external contact, economic stress signs, and prosecution records.
6. A physical protection insider reliability assessment device, the device comprising: The system comprises an acquisition module, a judgment module and a judgment module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring an index system for personnel reliability evaluation, the index system comprises a reliability risk value and N personnel evaluation dimensions, each personnel evaluation dimension comprises a plurality of reliability elements, and N is a positive integer; The first evaluation module is connected with the acquisition module and is used for carrying out pairwise contrast evaluation on the relative importance degree between the dimensions of the N personnel evaluation dimensions to obtain a first judgment matrix, carrying out pairwise contrast evaluation on the relative importance degree between the elements of the reliability elements under each personnel evaluation dimension to obtain a second judgment matrix, The first judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation between the personnel evaluation dimensions of the criterion layer, and the second judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation of each reliability element in the personnel evaluation dimensions of the reliability element; The first determining module is connected with the first evaluating module and is used for determining a first weight of each personnel evaluating dimension according to the first judging matrix and determining a second weight of each reliability element according to the second judging matrix; The second determining module is connected with the first determining module and is used for determining element scores of all reliability elements according to personnel information of personnel to be evaluated; The second evaluation module is connected with the second determination module and is used for determining a dimension risk value of the personnel evaluation dimension according to the element score of each reliability element and the second weight; The third evaluation module is connected with the second evaluation module and is used for determining the reliability risk value of the person to be evaluated according to the dimension risk value of each person evaluation dimension and the first weight.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the first evaluation module comprises: The first evaluation unit is used for executing the step 1 of comparing the N personnel evaluation dimensions in pairs, and obtaining the importance degree value of each personnel evaluation dimension relative to other personnel evaluation dimensions according to a nine-minute scale method; the first generation module is used for executing the step 2 of generating an initial judgment matrix according to the importance degree value corresponding to each personnel evaluation dimension; the verification unit is used for executing the step 3 of carrying out consistency verification on the initial judgment matrix to obtain a consistency ratio; And 4, controlling the first evaluation unit, the first generation module and the verification unit to re-execute the steps 1 to 3 until the consistency ratio is lower than or equal to a preset threshold value under the condition that the consistency ratio is higher than the preset threshold value, and determining the initial judgment matrix as the first judgment matrix, wherein the first judgment matrix is a positive-negative matrix.
8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the first determining module comprises: the analysis unit is used for weighting the first judgment matrix by adopting a feature vector method to obtain a feature vector corresponding to the dominant direction; and the first determining unit is used for carrying out normalization processing on the feature vectors to obtain first weights of the evaluation dimensions of the personnel.
9. A method of managing physically protected internals, comprising: The method for evaluating the reliability of the personnel in the physical protection according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the reliability risk value of the personnel to be evaluated is obtained; According to the reliability risk value, making personnel management measures; And managing personnel in the physical protection according to the personnel management measures.
10. A physically protected internal personnel management system, comprising: the device for evaluating the reliability of the physical protection personnel in the interior according to any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein the device is used for obtaining the reliability risk value of the personnel to be evaluated through the method for evaluating the reliability of the physical protection personnel in the interior; the generating module is connected with the reliability evaluation device of the personnel inside the physical protection and is used for generating personnel management measures according to the reliability risk value; And the execution module is connected with the generation module and is used for managing personnel in the physical protection according to the personnel management measures.

Description

Method, management method, device and system for evaluating reliability of personnel inside physical protection Technical Field The invention belongs to the technical field of nuclear power, and particularly relates to a method, a management method, a device and a system for evaluating reliability of personnel inside physical protection. Background In the physical protection system, the reliability of internal personnel is a comprehensive characterization of the ability and stability of measuring the practitioner to observe rules, perform responsibilities and avoid intentional or misbehavior to trigger a security event on a core-involved post, and is one of key influencing factors in physical protection risk analysis. The method has the advantages that the reliability of the internal personnel is effectively evaluated, potential human risk sources are recognized, and the overall cooperative efficiency of the physical defense, the technical defense and the personal defense is improved. Currently, personnel reliability assessment depends on practice of internal regulations and experience of a plurality of units, and qualitative judgment is often carried out by a small number of dimensions (such as basic background examination or post performance), or grading is carried out by manual subjective scoring. The part of the method processes the personnel under different posts and different risk situations by similar standards, only makes coarse granularity distinction according to post sensitivity, qualification certificate or history violation records, and directly uses the experience of the security industry or the guiding clauses of foreign institutions as reference basis. Therefore, the problems of lack of quantification standard, strong subjectivity, single evaluation dimension and the like exist in the aspect of personnel reliability evaluation in the prior art, and the accuracy and the refinement degree of the physical protection risk evaluation of the nuclear facilities are low. Therefore, the prior art is not highly accurate in terms of personnel reliability assessment. Disclosure of Invention The technical problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a method, a management method, a device and a system for evaluating the reliability of the personnel inside the physical protection, aiming at the defects in the prior art, and the accuracy of the reliability evaluation of the personnel inside the physical protection can be improved by using the method. In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating reliability of personnel in protecting a real object, including: acquiring an index system of personnel reliability evaluation, wherein the index system comprises a reliability risk value and N personnel evaluation dimensions, each personnel evaluation dimension comprises a plurality of reliability elements, and N is a positive integer; The N personnel evaluation dimensions are subjected to pairwise contrast evaluation to evaluate the relative importance degree among the dimensions, so as to obtain a first judgment matrix, the relative importance degree among the elements is subjected to pairwise contrast evaluation aiming at a plurality of reliability elements under each personnel evaluation dimension, so as to obtain a second judgment matrix, The first judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation between the personnel evaluation dimensions of the criterion layer, and the second judgment matrix is used for representing the relative importance relation of each reliability element in the personnel evaluation dimensions of the reliability element; Determining a first weight of each personnel evaluation dimension according to the first judgment matrix, and determining a second weight of each reliability element according to the second judgment matrix; determining element scores of all reliability elements according to personnel information of personnel to be evaluated; Determining a dimension risk value of the personnel assessment dimension according to the element scores and the second weights of the reliability elements; And determining the reliability risk value of the person to be evaluated according to the dimension risk value of each person evaluation dimension and the first weight. In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a device for evaluating reliability of protecting personnel in a real object, including: the system comprises an acquisition module, a judgment module and a judgment module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring an index system of personnel reliability evaluation, the index system comprises a reliability risk value and N personnel evaluation dimensions, each personnel evaluation dimension comprises a plurality of reliability elements, and N is a positive integer; The first evaluation module is connected with the acquisition module and is used for carrying out pairw