CN-121998494-A - Full-flow management method for forced human factor prevention and storage medium

CN121998494ACN 121998494 ACN121998494 ACN 121998494ACN-121998494-A

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of whole-flow management, in particular to a forced human factor prevention whole-flow management method and a storage medium. A full-flow management method for forced human factor prevention comprises the following steps of acquiring operation stages, post information and operation information of an operator when the operator operates on a pre-built simulation system, checking the operator according to the operation stages, post information and operation information of the operator, determining whether the operator has actual operation qualification according to a checking result, and acquiring a pre-built management work sheet table when the operator has the actual operation qualification, wherein the management work sheet table comprises the operation information and operation risks of different responsibility posts in different stages, and the operator can operate a DCS system according to the operation information and the corresponding trap information of the corresponding responsibility post in the corresponding stage in the management work sheet table. The invention can improve the precautionary awareness of personnel. And an operation check closed loop is formed according to the management work order table, so that the production safety is further ensured.

Inventors

ZOU XIANGYANG
Dou Qiangui
Huo Xuehu
LI DONG
Deng Siyin
Qiu Xuebin
XIAN JIANG
LI GUANG
WEN DENGYU
ZHANG XUN
LIU JIANJUN

Assignees

台山核电合营有限公司

Dates

Publication Date: 20260508
Application Date: 20260120

Claims (10)

1. The full-flow management method for forcibly preventing human factors is characterized by comprising the following steps of: Step S01, when an operator operates on a pre-built simulation system, acquiring the operation stage, post information and operation information of the operator; Step S02, according to the operation stage, post information and operation information of the operator, checking the operator, and determining whether the operator has actual operation qualification according to the checking result; And S03, acquiring a pre-established management work list when the actual operation qualification exists, wherein the management work list comprises operation information and operation risks of different responsibility posts in different stages, so that an operator can operate the DCS according to the operation information and the corresponding trap information of the corresponding responsibility posts in the corresponding stage in the management work list.
2. The full-flow management method according to claim 1, further comprising: step S04, according to the operation information of the operator in the DCS system, checking the actual operation behavior of the operator; step S05, determining the actual operation authority of the operator according to the assessment result; and step S06, when the actual operation authority is lower than a preset requirement, re-executing the step S01.
3. The full-flow management method according to claim 1, wherein the step S01 includes: presetting the operation stage and the post information corresponding to the simulation system; and obtaining the operation information according to the operation of the operator on the simulation system.
4. The full-flow management method according to claim 1, wherein the step S02 includes: matching corresponding assessment standards according to the operation stage and the post information; and comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an assessment result.
5. The full-flow management method according to claim 4, wherein comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an assessment result comprises: comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an operation integral of the operator; and judging the operation authority of the operator according to the total operation integral of the operator to obtain the assessment result.
6. The full-flow management method according to claim 5, wherein comparing the operation information with the assessment criterion to obtain the operator operation score comprises: Performing weight assignment on the operation items corresponding to the operation information according to the risk classification standard of the assessment standard to obtain item points; Acquiring an execution state of the operation item from the operation information; and mapping the execution state and the item integral through the operation item, and then calculating to obtain the operation integral.
7. The full-flow management method according to claim 1, characterized by comprising, before said step S03: converting the design document and the historical data into a knowledge graph by utilizing an information extraction technology; Establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and the operation post; and generating the management work order table according to the interaction matrix and the knowledge graph.
8. The full-process management method according to claim 7, wherein the converting the design document and the history data into the knowledge-graph using the information extraction technique comprises: Acquiring an operation specification, an operation principle and a safety specification from the design document by using the information extraction technology, and establishing a thinking guide diagram; And mapping the historical data to the mind map through structured data to obtain the knowledge graph.
9. The full-flow management method according to claim 7, wherein the establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and the operation posts comprises: matching the operation posts with the knowledge graph to obtain post responsibilities in an operation stage; and performing binary combination on the operation post, the post responsibility and the operation stage to obtain the interaction matrix.
10. A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program, wherein the computer program when executed by a processor implements the forced anti-human full flow management method of any of claims 1-9.

Description

Full-flow management method for forced human factor prevention and storage medium Technical Field The invention relates to the technical field of whole-flow management, in particular to a forced human factor prevention whole-flow management method and a storage medium. Background Along with the wide application of DCS in nuclear power units, DCS signals force human errors to become important factors affecting the safe operation of a nuclear power plant. The annual unplanned events (IOE/LOE) caused by human error are forced to be 4-6 by DCS signals, and the unplanned events account for 30% -40% of the instrument control human events. The DCS signals force human errors to directly influence the availability and safety performance of the unit through an operation error-equipment out-of-control-safety chain breakage path, and the safety operation of the nuclear power plant is systematically threatened. Disclosure of Invention The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a forced anti-human full-flow management method and a storage medium. The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is that the full-flow management method for forcedly preventing human factors comprises the following steps: Step S01, when an operator operates on a pre-built simulation system, acquiring the operation stage, post information and operation information of the operator; Step S02, according to the operation stage, post information and operation information of the operator, checking the operator, and determining whether the operator has actual operation qualification according to the checking result; And S03, acquiring a pre-established management work list when the actual operation qualification exists, wherein the management work list comprises operation information and operation risks of different responsibility posts in different stages, so that an operator can operate the DCS according to the operation information and the corresponding trap information of the corresponding responsibility posts in the corresponding stage in the management work list. Optionally, the method further comprises: step S04, according to the operation information of the operator in the DCS system, checking the actual operation behavior of the operator; step S05, determining the actual operation authority of the operator according to the assessment result; and step S06, when the actual operation authority is lower than a preset requirement, re-executing the step S01. Optionally, the step S01 includes: presetting the operation stage and the post information corresponding to the simulation system; and obtaining the operation information according to the operation of the operator on the simulation system. Optionally, the step S02 includes: matching corresponding assessment standards according to the operation stage and the post information; and comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an assessment result. Optionally, comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an assessment result includes: comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain an operation integral of the operator; and judging the operation authority of the operator according to the total operation integral of the operator to obtain the assessment result. Optionally, the comparing the operation information with the assessment standard to obtain the operator operation integral includes: Performing weight assignment on the operation items corresponding to the operation information according to the risk classification standard of the assessment standard to obtain item points; Acquiring an execution state of the operation item from the operation information; and mapping the execution state and the item integral through the operation item, and then calculating to obtain the operation integral. Optionally, before the step S03, the method includes: converting the design document and the historical data into a knowledge graph by utilizing an information extraction technology; Establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and the operation post; and generating the management work order table according to the interaction matrix and the knowledge graph. Optionally, the converting the design document and the historical data into the knowledge graph by using the information extraction technology includes: Acquiring an operation specification, an operation principle and a safety specification from the design document by using the information extraction technology, and establishing a thinking guide diagram; And mapping the historical data to the mind map through structured data to obtain the knowledge graph. Optionally, the establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and the operation post includes: matching the operation posts with the knowledge graph to obtain post responsibilities in an operation stage; and performing binary comb