Search

CN-122027647-A - Communication method of standard protocol of physical fuse burning instruction and burning execution device

CN122027647ACN 122027647 ACN122027647 ACN 122027647ACN-122027647-A

Abstract

The invention discloses a communication method of a standard protocol of a physical fuse burning instruction and a burning execution device, which relate to the technical field of electronic communication and control, in particular to the communication method of the standard protocol of the physical fuse burning instruction and the burning execution device. After the device verifies the effectiveness of the instruction, high-voltage pulse is generated within a specified time to burn the appointed physical fuse, and the state is fed back to the central monitoring terminal. The device comprises a communication module, an analysis verification module, a control module, a high-voltage pulse generation module and the like. The system supports local burning, real-time graphical updating of states, log inquiry and special permission modes, and realizes safe, reliable and traceable remote authorized burning control of the physical fuse.

Inventors

  • ZHANG QINGQUAN

Assignees

  • 深圳复现范式科技有限公司

Dates

Publication Date
20260512
Application Date
20260130

Claims (10)

  1. 1. The communication method of the standard protocol of the physical fuse burning instruction and the burning execution device are characterized by comprising the following steps: Defining a standard protocol format of a physical fuse burning instruction, wherein the format at least comprises a target level field, a fuse number list field, a burning-reason hash value field, an encryption check code field and a highest institution authorization code field; when a preset burning triggering condition is met, the central processing system generates a burning instruction conforming to the standard protocol format; pushing the burning instruction to at least one remote burning execution device through a high-speed communication link; the burning execution device receives and analyzes the burning instruction and verifies the validity of the format and the authorization information; If the verification is passed, the burning execution device generates a high-voltage pulse within a specified time after receiving the instruction so as to burn the physical fuse appointed in the instruction; The burning execution device feeds back the burning state information of the fuse to a central monitoring terminal.
  2. 2. The method for communicating a standard protocol for a physical fuse burn instruction and a burn-out device according to claim 1, wherein the standard protocol supports two data encoding formats, JSON and Protobuf, to ensure compatibility with different platforms of burn-out devices.
  3. 3. The method for communicating with a standard protocol for a physical fuse burn instruction and a burn execution apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said burn instruction supports local burn for a specific administrative division or system level, and only fuses triggering an abnormal area are burned without affecting other normal areas.
  4. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the system automatically updates the corresponding status on the graphic signboard of the central monitor terminal and performs real name notification after the fuse is burned.
  5. 5. The method for communicating with a standard protocol for a burn-out instruction for a physical fuse and the burn-out executing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said central monitoring terminal provides an interface for an authorized user to view status histories and execution logs of all burn-out instructions nationwide by one key.
  6. 6. The method for communicating a standard protocol for a burn instruction for a physical fuse and a burn execution apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said method supports a special mode in which a trigger authority of the burn instruction is limited to a highest authority and an instruction automatically generated by a system is suspended.
  7. 7. A burn-out execution apparatus for executing the method of any one of claims 1 to 6, comprising: the communication module is used for receiving the burning instruction; The analysis verification module is connected to the communication module and used for analyzing the instruction and verifying the validity of the instruction; the control unit is connected to the analysis and verification module and generates a control signal when the instruction is valid; the high-voltage pulse generating unit is connected to the control unit and used for generating a high-voltage pulse for burning in response to the control signal; and the fuse interface is used for connecting the physical fuse to be burned and receiving the high-voltage pulse.
  8. 8. The method for communicating with a standard protocol for a physical fuse burn instruction and a burn-out actuator according to claim 7, further comprising a status detection circuit for detecting an on-off status of the fuse and sending a status signal back to the central monitoring terminal via the communication module.
  9. 9. The communication method and the burn-out execution apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the program, when executed by the processor, is capable of realizing the function of the CPU system in the communication method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
  10. 10. The communication method and the burn-out execution apparatus of the standard protocol of the physical fuse burn-out instruction according to claim 1, wherein the communication method and the burn-out execution apparatus comprise a central processing system for generating the standard burn-out instruction according to claim 1, at least one burn-out execution apparatus according to claim 7 or 8, and a high-speed communication network for connecting the two together to form a physical fuse burn-out control system.

Description

Communication method of standard protocol of physical fuse burning instruction and burning execution device Technical Field The invention relates to the technical field of electronic communication and control, in particular to a communication method of a standard protocol of a physical fuse burning instruction and a burning execution device. Background With the rapid development of the fields of the internet of things, industrial automation, key infrastructure control and the like, the demands for remote, accurate and controllable failure or isolation operation of physical equipment are increasingly prominent. In various application scenes, the physical fuse is used as a classical, reliable and disposable circuit protection and physical isolation device, and the function of the physical fuse is expanded from the traditional overcurrent protection to the key safety and control fields of system safety isolation, equipment authority fusing, regional physical blocking and the like. For example, in grid security, it may be desirable to remotely blow a physical connection of a particular faulty line to prevent an incident from expanding, in sensitive equipment management it may be desirable to permanently destroy a certain functional module in the equipment in response to a security threat, and in distributed systems it may be desirable to conduct differential physical isolation depending on geographic or logical areas. Conventional fuse burn-out (blowing) operations typically rely on local manual triggering or simple electrical signal triggering, which have problems of slow response, low accuracy, lack of global coordination, authorization and audit difficulties, and have failed to meet the needs of modern, large-scale, high-security systems. Currently, implementing remote device control is mainly dependent on various communication protocols and actuators. However, for the specific operation of "physical fuse burn-out" with irreversible, high safety requirements, the prior art solutions have significant drawbacks: (1) The lack of standardized command protocols-existing remote control commands (such as certain switching value control commands in industrial control protocols) are generally generic and are not specifically designed for the characteristics of the physical fuse burn operation. Such operations require explicit target identification (which device, which fuse), mandatory operation authorization (who has authority to place, why to place), and strict tamper-proof and verification mechanisms. The general protocol has dead zones in the aspects of field definition, security encapsulation, reason tracing and the like, and is easy to cause misoperation, unauthorized operation or operation responsibility cannot be traced. (2) The communication compatibility and efficiency problems are that execution devices of different manufacturers may adopt different data formats and communication interfaces, so that a central control system needs to adapt to various protocols, and complexity and maintenance cost are increased. Meanwhile, the transmission of the burnout instruction requires high reliability and a certain real-time performance, and particularly in an emergency, a high-speed and low-delay communication link is required to ensure that the instruction reaches the target rapidly. (3) The authorization and security mechanisms are weak, physical burnout is an irreversible destructive operation, and the authorization must be extremely strict. The existing system often relies on simpler passwords or network authority verification and lacks a multi-level auditable authorization chain. For example, failure to bind the "cause of burn" to the instruction in a non-repudiated manner (e.g., hash value) also lacks the highest level of authority separation and management mechanisms for emergency authorization and automatic authorization of the everyday system. (4) The lack of fine granularity and visual control is that the system generally cannot support accurate burning strategies based on complex dimensions (such as specific administrative division and system level), and the system is easy to cause 'one-cut' and affects normal region operation. In addition, the operation states (instruction generation, transmission, execution and result) lack centralized, real-time and graphical monitoring and feedback, so that management personnel have difficulty in globally grasping situations, and inquiry and audit of a history log are inconvenient. (5) The execution device has single function, the existing remote trigger device only has the basic functions of receiving signals and generating driving actions, and lacks intelligent functions of format analysis, safety verification, real-time state detection, automatic feedback and the like of the received instructions, so that the reliability, the automation degree and the maintainability of the whole control chain are greatly reduced. Therefore, there is a strong need for a physical fuse