EP-4739389-A2 - USE OF A MARKER OR A MARKER SET FOR DETERMINING THE RISK OF AN INDIVIDUAL TO HAVE A REDUCED LIVER FUNCTION
Abstract
The present invention relates, amongst others, to the use of a marker or a marker set in an in vitro method for determining the risk of an individual to have a reduced liver function. The marker is chosen from a first group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1, valine, and lactate; the marker set comprises at least two substances chosen from a second group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1, valine, lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate.
Inventors
- DE JEL, Sebastian
- STÄMMLER, Frank
- RÖTZER, Sebastian
- ROBERTSON, ANDREW
- EIGLSPERGER, Johannes
Assignees
- Numares AG
Dates
- Publication Date
- 20260513
- Application Date
- 20240704
Claims (15)
- 1. Use of a marker or of a marker set in an in vitro method for determining the risk of an individual to have a reduced liver function, characterized in that the marker is chosen from a first group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, and lactate and in that the marker set comprises at least two substances chosen from a second group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate.
- 2. Use according to claim 1 , characterized in that the marker set comprises at least one substance chosen from the second group and being different from high-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein A1 if the marker set comprises any of high-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances.
- 3. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances and valine as a second of the at least two substances.
- 4. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances and lactate as a second of the at least two substances.
- 5. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances and pyruvate as a second of the at least two substances.
- 6. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances and fumarate as a second of the at least two substances.
- 7. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises valine and lactate.
- 8. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises valine and pyruvate.
- 9. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises lactate and pyruvate.
- 10. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances as well as valine and pyruvate as further substances.
- 1 1 . Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises high-density lipoprotein or apolipoprotein A1 as a first of the at least two substances as well as valine and lactate as further substances.
- 12. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the marker set comprises valine, pyruvate, and lactate.
- 13. Marker or marker set for use in in-vivo diagnostics of a reduced liver function, characterized in that the marker is chosen from a first group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, and lactate and in that the marker set comprises at least two substances chosen from a second group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate.
- 14. Method for analyzing an isolated body fluid sample in vitro, comprising the following steps: a) determining the concentration of a substance or of at least two substances, wherein the substance is chosen from a first group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, and lactate and wherein the at least two substances are chosen from a second group consisting of high-density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A1 , valine, lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate in an isolated body fluid sample from an individual by analyzing the body fluid sample with a suited measuring technique, b) calculating a score from the determined concentrations, the score being indicative for determining the risk of the individual to have a reduced liver function.
- 15. Method according to claim 14, characterized in that calculating the score involves calculating a ratio between at least two concentration values.
Description
Use of a marker or a marker set for determining the risk of an individual to have a reduced liver function Description The present invention relates to the in-vitro use of a marker or a marker set for determining the risk of an individual to have a reduced liver function according to the preamble of claim 1 , to the further medical use of such a marker or a marker set according to the preamble of claim 13, and to an analysis method for determining the risk of an individual to have a reduced liver function according to the preamble of claim 14. More generally, the present invention relates to biomarkers that are applicable for accurately estimating liver function. The term “liver function” is broad, given the vast array of physiological and biochemical functions the organ carries out, chiefly biliary synthesis for fatty acid digestion, metabolism of carbohydrate, protein and lipids, synthesis of protein and detoxification. Thus, hepatocyte function is paramount to physiological survival. Given the broad range of functions the liver carries out, it is challenging to accurately define liver function numerically, as opposed to the glomerular filtration rate of the kidney or the ejection fraction of the heart. A number of blood tests are available which reflect the general damage to hepatocytes - mostly products of hepatic metabolic pathways and enzymes - the most common in clinical practice being serum aminotransferases, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and prothrombin time. These tests are commonly grouped together under the umbrella term ‘Liver Function Tests’ which is misleading, since most are unable to reflect how well the liver is functioning and abnormal values can be due to diseases unrelated to the liver. Moreover, these tests may be normal in patients with advanced liver disease yet abnormal in asymptomatic healthy individuals [1 -3]. The combination of detection of serial changes in this test panel interpreted together with patient symptomatology can assist in monitoring progression or remission of disease and can trigger subsequent and more advanced diagnostic testing. Current specific liver function tests are limited. The dye indocyanine green has been in practice for decades for liver function monitoring. The so-called indocyanine green tracer test (ICG) measures hepatic elimination of the dye and is hence a diagnostic tool of overall liver function and a prognostic predictor of mortality. For example, it has utility in peri-operative liver function monitoring during liver surgery, an assessment of liver failure acuity, and as a prognostic tool for critically ill patients. Adverse reactions are rare although it is contraindicated in known iodine allergy. Despite its utility, strong levels of evidence are lacking, and it is therefore not recommended for routine liver function assessment [4,5]. Image-based modalities assessing liver function exist but are limited in scope and resource. Nuclear medicine scans metastable technetium-99 (99mTc) galactosyl and mebrofenin using plain scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) have been utilized, however these modalities deliver significant radiation exposure to the patient and user. Gadolinium enhanced MRI [Gd-EOB] can show high spatial and temporal metabolic resolution in the liver, yet is strictly limited by MRI availability and cost [6,7], A simpler measure of global liver function lies with the Child-Pugh score, particularly in patients having cirrhosis. Originally designed to assess the risk of non-shunt operations in patients with cirrhosis (namely transection of the esophagus for bleeding esophageal varices), it was further validated to stratify the risk of portacaval shunt surgery in patients with cirrhosis. It was also later demonstrated to correlate with survival in patients not undergoing surgery. Additionally, Child-Pugh class is also associated with the likelihood of developing complications of cirrhosis, such as variceal hemorrhage. Components of the modified Child-Pugh classification of the severity of liver disease are degree of ascites, the serum concentrations of bilirubin and albumin, the prothrombin time, and the degree of encephalopathy. A total Child-Pugh score (sometimes also referred to as Child-Turcotte-Pugh score) of 5 to 6 is considered Child-Pugh class A (well-compensated disease, 10 % postoperative mortality risk), a score of 7 to 9 is class B (significant functional compromise, 30 % postoperative mortality risk), and a score of 10 to 15 is class C (decompensated disease, 82 % postoperative mortality risk).These classes correlate with one- and two-year patient survival: class A: 100 and 85 %; class B: 80 and 60 %; and class C: 45 and 35 % [8-11 ]. As such, an accurate Child- Pugh score as an estimation of global liver function has significant utility in perioperative planning of patients with cirrhosis, resource management, prioritization of liver treatment, identification of those at ris