KR-20260063080-A - SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING CONSISTENCY FOR CONNECTOR SELECTION

Abstract

A connector selection consistency verification system according to one embodiment of the present invention includes: a memory; and a processor that constructs a database regarding the status of terminals by connector based on connector information stored in the memory, and verifies the connector selection consistency using the constructed database.

Inventors

• 최문석

Assignees

• 주식회사 경신

Dates

Publication Date

20260507

Application Date

20241030

Claims (18)

1. Memory; and A processor that constructs a database regarding the terminal status of each connector based on connector information stored in the memory above, and verifies the consistency of connector selection using the constructed database. A connector selection compatibility verification system characterized by including
2. In paragraph 1, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by managing the database by inputting terminal values according to terminal part names, automatically inputting the terminal values managed according to the terminal part names when a connector is selected, and automatically inputting terminal values by pin when an INSERT KEY IN is performed.
3. In paragraph 1, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by loading connector information from the above database, the connector information including at least one of connector-specific waterproof status information, manufacturer information, type information, and vehicle-specific connector terminal information, and verifying the connector selection consistency based on the loaded connector information.
4. In paragraph 3, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by further loading connector insertion force information, including an average and maximum insertion force value, as connector information from the above database to verify the connector selection consistency.
5. In paragraph 4, The above processor A connector selection compatibility verification system characterized by comparing at least one of the average and maximum values of the insertion force with a first reference value, and determining the verification result of the connector selection compatibility as 'negative' if, as a result of the comparison, at least one of the average and maximum values of the insertion force exceeds the first reference value.
6. In paragraph 1, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by verifying the connector selection consistency by counting the number of pins for each terminal based on information entered into the database regarding the status of connector terminals.
7. In paragraph 6, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by calculating a margin rate for each terminal based on the number of pins for each terminal counted above, and verifying the connector selection consistency based on the calculated margin rate for each terminal.
8. In Paragraph 7, The above processor A connector selection compatibility verification system characterized by comparing the margin rate for each terminal with a second reference value, and determining the verification result of the connector selection compatibility as 'negative' if the margin rate for each terminal is less than the second reference value as a result of the comparison.
9. In paragraph 1, The above processor A connector selection consistency verification system characterized by determining the verification result of the connector selection consistency as 'sum' when at least one of the average and maximum insertion force values included in the connector insertion force information is less than or equal to a first reference value and the margin rate for each terminal is greater than or equal to a second reference value.
10. A step in which the processor builds a database regarding the terminal status by connector based on connector information stored in memory; and The step in which the above processor verifies the consistency of connector selection using the above-established database A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including
11. In Paragraph 10, The above processor A method for verifying the consistency of a connector selection, characterized by managing the database by inputting terminal values according to terminal part names, automatically inputting the terminal values managed according to terminal part names when a connector is selected, and automatically inputting terminal values by pin when an INSERT KEY IN is performed.
12. In Paragraph 10, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of loading connector information from the above database, including at least one of connector-specific waterproof status information, manufacturer information, type information, and vehicle-specific connector terminal information; and A step of verifying the compatibility of the connector selection based on the loaded connector information. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including
13. In Paragraph 12, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of verifying the consistency of the connector selection by further loading connector insertion force information, including average and maximum insertion force values, as connector information from the above database. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by further including
14. In Paragraph 13, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of comparing at least one of the above average insertion force value and maximum value with a first reference value; and A step of determining the verification result of the connector selection compatibility as 'negative' when, as a result of the above comparison, at least one of the average value and the maximum value of the insertion force exceeds the first reference value. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including
15. In Paragraph 10, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of verifying the consistency of the connector selection by counting the number of pins for each terminal based on the information entered into the database regarding the status of the connector terminals. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including
16. In paragraph 15, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of calculating a margin for each terminal based on the number of pins for each terminal counted above; and A step of verifying the connector selection consistency based on the margin rate for each terminal calculated above. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by further including
17. In Paragraph 16, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of comparing the margin rate for each of the above terminals with a second reference value; and A step of determining the verification result of the connector selection compatibility as 'Negative' if, as a result of the above comparison, the margin rate for each terminal is less than the second reference value. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including
18. In Paragraph 10, The step of verifying the compatibility of the above connector selection is A step of determining the verification result of the connector selection compatibility as 'sum' when at least one of the average and maximum insertion force values included in the connector insertion force information is less than or equal to a first reference value and the margin rate for each terminal is greater than or equal to a second reference value. A connector selection compatibility verification method characterized by including

Description

System and Method for Verifying Consistency in Connector Selection Embodiments of the present invention relate to a connector selection compatibility verification system and method. An automobile is a vehicle capable of traveling freely on the road without relying on rails by utilizing the power of an engine installed in the vehicle body, and is currently becoming increasingly advanced to provide safety and various services for drivers and passengers. Accordingly, current automobiles are equipped with various advanced electronic devices to provide safety and various services for drivers and passengers, and the wiring to connect and operate these various electronic devices is also becoming more complex. As wiring becomes more complex as described above, connectors, which are widely used as a means to facilitate easy wiring splicing, allow for easy connection by securing multiple wires to the connector and then joining the connectors with the secured wires together. However, the compatibility check for selected connectors is currently performed through simple manual inspection. In other words, according to conventional technology, the process involves manual creation and result review using basic data such as connector lists, symbol diagrams, and insertion force management files. Consequently, verifying the consistency of connector selection leads to problems such as increased human error and time consumption due to manual review and creation. This also raises the issue of reduced verification reliability resulting from unnecessary work inefficiency. The technology forming the background of the present invention is disclosed in Korean Registered Patent Publication No. 10-0476676 (March 4, 2005). FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a connector selection compatibility verification device according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 2 to 6 are drawings illustrating the operation of a connector selection compatibility verification device according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method for verifying the compatibility of a connector selection according to an embodiment of the present invention. The advantages and/or features of the present invention and the methods for achieving them will become clear by referring to the embodiments described below in detail together with the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below but may be implemented in various different forms. These embodiments are provided merely to ensure that the disclosure of the present invention is complete and to fully inform those skilled in the art of the scope of the invention, and the present invention is defined only by the scope of the claims. Throughout the specification, the same reference numerals refer to the same components. In addition, the preferred embodiments of the present invention described below focus on explaining the functional configurations that must be additionally provided for the present invention, while omitting as much as possible the system functional configurations that are already provided in each system functional configuration or are ordinarily provided in the technical field to which the present invention belongs, in order to efficiently explain the technical components constituting the present invention. If a person skilled in the art to which the present invention belongs is able to easily understand the functions of the components that are conventionally used among the functional configurations that are omitted and not illustrated below, and can also clearly understand the relationship between the components omitted as above and the components added for the present invention. Furthermore, in the following description, terms such as "transmission," "communication," "transmission," "reception," and other terms of similar meaning regarding signals or information include not only the direct transfer of signals or information from one component to another but also the transfer through other components. In particular, "transmitting" or "transmitting" a signal or information to a component refers to the final destination of the signal or information and does not imply a direct destination. The same applies to the "reception" of signals or information. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a connector selection compatibility verification device according to one embodiment of the present invention, and FIGS. 2 to 6 are drawings illustrating the operation of a connector selection compatibility verification device according to one embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 1, a connector selection compatibility verification device (100) according to one embodiment of the present invention may be configured to include a memory (110), a communication unit (120), and a processor (130). The me