Search

KR-20260063829-A - Method For Providing UI for Floating Dock Loadout Control and System for the Same

KR20260063829AKR 20260063829 AKR20260063829 AKR 20260063829AKR-20260063829-A

Abstract

This document concerns a method for providing a floating dock loadout control UI and a system for this purpose. The proposed load-out control UI system includes: a display showing the amount of water supplied to a plurality of tanks placed on the hull of the floating dock; and an alarm generator configured to generate an alarm under a predetermined condition during the load-out process. At this time, the display is configured to display a state in which a fixed amount of water is applied to a central tank placed in the longitudinal center of the hull, and may include a first configuration for releasing the state in which the fixed amount of water is applied.

Inventors

  • 김남훈
  • 한준영

Assignees

  • 에이치디한국조선해양 주식회사
  • 에이치디현대삼호 주식회사
  • 에이치디현대중공업 주식회사

Dates

Publication Date
20260507
Application Date
20241031

Claims (14)

  1. In a UI (User Interface) system for loadout control using a floating dock, A display showing the amount of water supplied to a plurality of tanks arranged in the hull of the above-mentioned floating dock; and The above load-out process includes an alarm generator configured to generate an alarm under predetermined conditions, wherein The above display is, It is configured to indicate a state in which a fixed amount of water is applied to a central tank located in the longitudinal center of the hull, and A first configuration for releasing the state in which the above fixed water supply amount is applied, Loadout control UI system.
  2. In Article 1, The above display is, A configuration configured to indicate a state in which, while a fixed amount of water is applied to a central tank positioned in the longitudinal center of the hull, the amount of water supplied to a bow tank positioned in the bow of the hull and a stern tank positioned in the stern of the hull is variably controlled. Loadout control UI system.
  3. In Article 1, The above predetermined conditions are, Corresponding to one or more of the occurrence of sagging, pump capacity issues, or defects of the above floating dock, Loadout control UI system.
  4. In Paragraph 3, The above display additionally includes a second configuration indicating a defect of the floating dock, and In the event of a defect in the above floating dock, the alarm generator and the second configuration operate in combination. Loadout control UI system.
  5. In Article 1, The above display is, A third configuration additionally comprising controlling the opening and closing of a valve to collectively apply ballasting or deballasting to all of the plurality of tanks or a predetermined group among the plurality of tanks. Loadout control UI system.
  6. In Article 5, The above display is, A fourth configuration additionally comprising controlling the opening and closing of a valve for applying ballasting or deballasting to each of the plurality of tanks, Loadout control UI system.
  7. In Article 1, The above display is, additionally including a fifth configuration indicating the difference in elevation between land and sea, Loadout control UI system.
  8. In Article 1, The above display is, It additionally includes a sixth configuration that displays a draft, The above-mentioned sixth configuration is configured to highlight a gravity-free flow applicable tank, Loadout control UI system.
  9. In a method for providing a UI (User Interface) for loadout control using a floating dock, Displaying the amount of water supplied to a plurality of tanks positioned on the hull of the floating dock through a display; and It includes generating an alarm when a predetermined condition is satisfied in the load-out process through an alarm generator, wherein Indicating the amount of water supplied to the above plurality of tanks is, Indicates a state in which a fixed amount of water is applied to a central tank positioned in the longitudinal center of the hull; and Includes displaying a state in which the fixed water supply amount is applied according to the operation of the first configuration of the above display, Method for providing a UI for loadout control.
  10. In Article 9, In a state where a fixed amount of water is applied to the central tank, the display additionally indicates a state in which the amount of water supplied to the bow tank positioned at the bow of the hull and the amount of water supplied to the stern tank positioned at the stern of the hull are variably controlled. Method for providing a UI for loadout control.
  11. In Article 9, The above predetermined conditions are, Corresponding to one or more of the occurrence of sagging, pump capacity issues, or defects of the above floating dock, Method for providing a UI for loadout control.
  12. In Article 11, When a defect occurs in the above floating dock, generating the above alarm is, Including displaying defects of the floating dock through the above display, Method for providing a UI for loadout control.
  13. In Article 9, The above loadout process is A first layer that controls the value of a variable corresponding to the plurality of tanks based on hogging characteristics for maintaining a step difference; A second layer controlling the height difference and equal drainage volume; A third layer controlling the entry of the main vessel and equal discharge volume; A fourth layer that performs verification based on the plurality of pump capacities mentioned above; Fifth layer performing bow-stern synchronization and trim adjustment; A sixth layer that performs equal water level conversion; and Automatically controlled by a recurrent neural network including a seventh layer that outputs the values of the plurality of variables and restores the target bending moment to its original state, Method for providing a UI for loadout control.
  14. In Article 13, Indicating the amount of water supplied to the above plurality of tanks is, Includes displaying variables corresponding to the plurality of tanks according to the recurrent neural network through the display. Method for providing a UI for loadout control.

Description

Method for Providing UI for Floating Dock Loadout Control and System for the Same The following description relates to a method for providing a User Interface (UI) utilized in a system for automatically controlling the loadout of a ship under construction using a floating dock, and a system for this purpose. Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the concept of a floating dock and load-out process. Floating Dock (110) is primarily used to move ships (120) built on land from the quay (130) toward the sea and launch them, or to redocking ships that require repair or repainting, instead of the existing dry dock. Normally, it is used as a quay (130) for outfitting work on launched ships. In particular, the process of moving ships (120) from land to sea is subdivided into Loadout among land-based construction methods. As shown in FIG. 1, a link beam (140) may additionally be used for the connection between the quay wall (130) and the floating dock (110). At this time, ballasting and deballasting are determined according to the increase in light weight (LWT) of the large vessel that has finished preparing for launching, based on the change in currents on the west coast and the speed of moving it to land, and it is possible to check whether they have been properly performed through land/sea level difference monitoring. As described above, the load-out process using a floating dock is defined by the following main operating principles, primarily reflecting the characteristics of the 6,500 TEU container ship and 155k LNGC LWT, which were the main vessel types about 17 years ago. 1) Selective ballasting and deballasting applied to only some tanks (no margin during manual operation) 2) Adjustment of longitudinal strength using the central tank (for the purpose of minimizing the step difference at the onshore/offshore connection) 3) Adjust trim with forward and stern tanks (to maintain Even Keel conditions) However, compared to the existing system, the main types of vessels currently applicable to the onshore construction method have become larger, such as 8,000 TEU container ships and 174k LNGCs, and accordingly, the existing operating principles have the following problems. 1) Some tanks alone cannot balance the tank ballasting corresponding to the main ship's LWT. 2) Since the pump in the central tank is used in conjunction with other longitudinal tanks, 2-1) the step difference is widened due to the slow response speed of the floating dock when the valve is opened or closed, or 2-2) the step difference is widened by reducing the efficiency of the other tank used in conjunction. 3) Even when adjusting the trim with the bow and stern tanks, 3-1) the even kill balance was not achieved while meeting the pump capacity, 3-2) the trim change amount was too sensitive compared to the ballasting change amount, or 3-3) the total watering time increased because it was not adjusted to the same level as other tanks in the transverse direction. Figures 2 to 4 are drawings for explaining the UI currently used in the floating dock loadout. Figures 2 to 4 focus on illustrating the items displayed to the user (operator) in the CCR (Cargo Control Room). Specifically, 2100 in FIG. 2 represents a screen for monitoring the step difference and can be configured to allow visual confirmation of trestle support, etc., at the linked beam position. Additionally, 2220 in FIG. 2 exemplarily displays the onshore construction schedule (Jack-up→Loadout→Jack-down→Launching→Quayside-Berthing). 3100 in FIG. 3 indicates monitoring of wireless transmission of optical measurement results and related wireless communication conditions, and at this time, it is possible to check for reception errors or perform controls such as adjusting the main line's forward speed. In addition, 3200 in FIG. 3 indicates a display device related to a water ballasting pump and valve mimic. In addition, 4100 in Fig. 4 represents the situation at the site while the main line entry is in progress, and 4200 in Fig. 4 represents the situation where the main line entry is completed and the remaining schedule is in progress at the Jack-down and Launching position. However, since the UI used in the aforementioned floating dock loadout is not a form in which an application for automatically performing loadouts is applied, there is a problem of sporadically providing necessary displays. Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the concept of a floating dock and load-out process. Figures 2 to 4 are drawings for explaining the UI currently used in the floating dock loadout. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the concept of a ballast sequence to which embodiments of the present invention are applied. FIG. 6 is a drawing illustrating the arrangement relationship of a plurality of tanks in a floating dock according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of a load-out control system according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 8 is a d