KR-20260064109-A - Method for displaying assembly work schedule of ship panel based on simulation and apparatus thereof

Abstract

One embodiment of the present invention discloses a panel assembly simulation system for ship construction.

Inventors

• 구본근
• 성새날
• 이정만
• 민형철
• 이동하

Assignees

• 에이치디한국조선해양 주식회사
• 에이치디현대중공업 주식회사
• 에이치디현대삼호 주식회사

Dates

Publication Date

20260507

Application Date

20241031

Claims (11)

1. A step of collecting load review scenarios that examine the loads for each assembly line of panels for shipbuilding; A step of performing a simulation for each assembly line based on the load review scenarios collected above; A step of analyzing the results of the above simulation to review the necessity of schedule changes; and A simulation-based method for outputting a ship panel assembly schedule, comprising the step of outputting the results of the review of the necessity for schedule change.
2. In paragraph 1, The step of performing the above simulation is, A simulation-based method for outputting a ship panel assembly schedule, which visually displays the blocks occupying the assembly line for each assembly line.
3. In paragraph 2, A simulation-based method for outputting a ship panel assembly schedule, wherein the blocks occupying the assembly line are displayed in different sizes for each block, reflecting the type of block and the actual size of the block.
4. In paragraph 1, The step of outputting the results of the review of the necessity for the above schedule change is, A simulation-based method for outputting a ship panel assembly schedule, which outputs at least one of the above-mentioned occupancy load, outfitting load, mounting load, welding load, and expected delay date per assembly line.
5. In paragraph 1, The above load review scenario is, A simulation-based method for outputting a ship panel assembly schedule, including information on the type of block produced through the above panel.
6. A computer-readable recording medium storing a program for executing the method according to paragraph 1.
7. Communications Department; Memory in which at least one program is stored; and By executing at least one of the above programs, the processor performs operations, and The above processor is, Collect load review scenarios that examine the loads for each assembly line of panels for shipbuilding, and Based on the load review scenarios collected above, a simulation is performed for each assembly line, and Analyze the results of the above simulation to review the necessity of schedule changes, and A simulation-based ship panel assembly schedule output device that controls the output of the results of the review of the necessity for the above schedule change.
8. In Paragraph 7, The above processor is, A simulation-based ship panel assembly schedule output device that controls the blocks occupying the assembly line for each assembly line to be visually displayed.
9. In paragraph 8, A simulation-based ship panel assembly schedule output device in which blocks occupying the assembly line are displayed in different sizes for each block, reflecting the type of block and the actual size of the block.
10. In Paragraph 7, The above processor is, A simulation-based ship panel assembly schedule output device that outputs at least one of the above-mentioned occupancy load, outfitting load, mounting load, welding load, and expected delay date per assembly line.
11. In Paragraph 7, The above load review scenario is a simulation-based ship panel assembly schedule output device that includes information on the type of block produced through the above panel.

Description

Method for displaying assembly work schedule of ship panel based on simulation and apparatus thereof The present invention relates to a method for automatically outputting a work schedule, and more specifically, to a method for outputting an assembly schedule of ship panels based on simulation and an apparatus for implementing the method. A block is a large structure made by assembling multiple panels and is used to form the interior partitions of a ship. Blocks are manufactured to form the main parts of a ship (e.g., hull, engine room, etc.), are moved to an external workshop using a transporter, and then combined with other blocks in the large block manufacturing process for loading into a dock. The block process is a larger unit of process than the panel process, and in the block process, the completed blocks can be assembled to construct the entire ship. Traditionally, due to the lack of systems for the prior verification and quantitative evaluation of panel assembly production plans at shipyards, planning management has been performed solely based on medium-term schedules (schedule planning for generating production work information). In the case of medium-term schedule-based planning, management is based on process input and output dates, and detailed predictive management, such as work progress rates and equipment load, is not performed. Conventional panel assembly production planning methods are unable to utilize existing data for tasks such as planning management and volume allocation. According to the prior art, load management of internal assembly lines in panel assembly plants is not accurately performed, requiring frequent changes to plans. Furthermore, the prior art does not include a system for predicting production load and conducting systematic reviews during the production execution plan scenario output process. Additionally, the prior art has limitations in managing and improving reference information due to the absence of methods for utilizing actual performance data, and suffers from inconsistency in load analysis depending on the person in charge, as there are no unified process prediction standards. Moreover, it is pointed out that the prior art requires a large amount of manpower for managing execution plan outputs, resulting in only perfunctory output management. FIG. 1 is a diagram for conceptually explaining a method according to the present invention. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of an assembly schedule output device according to the present invention. Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating a submodule included in the processor of Figure 2. FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of a first screen for initiating a simulation according to the present invention. FIG. 5 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of a second screen for initiating a simulation according to the present invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of a third screen for initiating a simulation according to the present invention. FIG. 7 is an example of a fourth screen configured as a visualized screen showing the block occupancy prediction of the assembly line when a simulation of the assembly work of a panel/block is performed in the present invention. Figure 8 is an example of a fifth screen configured with the results of the occupancy load analysis in assembly line B. Figure 9 is a schematic diagram showing the fifth screen. FIG. 10 is a drawing illustrating an example of a sixth screen output by an assembly schedule output device. FIG. 11 is a drawing illustrating an example of a seventh screen output by an assembly schedule output device. FIG. 12 is a drawing illustrating an example of the eighth screen output by an assembly schedule output device. FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method according to the present invention. The present invention is capable of various modifications and may have various embodiments; specific embodiments are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail in the detailed description. The effects and features of the present invention, and the methods for achieving them, will become clear by referring to the embodiments described below in detail together with the drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below but can be implemented in various forms. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. When describing with reference to the drawings, identical or corresponding components are given the same reference numerals, and redundant descriptions thereof will be omitted. In the following embodiments, terms such as first, second, etc. are used not in a limiting sense, but for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another component. In the following embodiments, singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. In the foll