Search

KR-20260064187-A - SIMULATION INSPECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING ELECTRONIC WARFARE PERFORMANCE OF RF SEEKER IN AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES

KR20260064187AKR 20260064187 AKR20260064187 AKR 20260064187AKR-20260064187-A

Abstract

According to various embodiments of the present invention, a simulation inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker may include: an antenna for inspecting a seeker that outputs a first RF signal to simulate a moving body; a decoy antenna that outputs a second RF signal to simulate a decoy radiated or reflected from the moving body; and a chaff antenna that outputs a third RF signal to simulate chaff radiated or reflected from the moving body.

Inventors

  • 은희현
  • 이종홍
  • 김재승
  • 황현성
  • 권병기

Assignees

  • 엘아이지디펜스앤에어로스페이스 주식회사

Dates

Publication Date
20260507
Application Date
20241031

Claims (12)

  1. An antenna for inspecting a seeker that outputs a first RF signal to simulate a moving object; A decoy antenna that outputs a second RF signal to simulate a decoy radiated or reflected from the above-mentioned moving body; and A simulation inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, comprising: a chaff antenna that outputs a third RF signal to simulate chaff radiated or reflected from the above-mentioned moving body.
  2. In paragraph 1, The above-mentioned explorer inspection antenna and the above-mentioned decoy antenna are provided to be movable, and The above chaff antenna is a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, characterized by being fixed.
  3. In paragraph 2, A first rail that provides a path and supports the above-mentioned explorer inspection antenna so that it can move; and A simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, further comprising a second rail that provides a path and supports the above decoy antenna so that it can move.
  4. In paragraph 1, A first signal generator connected to the antenna for checking the explorer to generate the first RF signal; A second signal generator connected to the above decoy antenna to generate the second RF signal; and A simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, further comprising: a third signal generator connected to the chaff antenna to generate the third RF signal.
  5. In paragraph 4, The first signal generator generates an RF jamming signal after generating the first RF signal, and A simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, characterized in that the above-mentioned seeker inspection antenna outputs an RF jamming signal after outputting the above-mentioned first RF signal.
  6. In paragraph 5, A first Doppler controller connected to the above-mentioned antenna for inspecting the explorer to control the Doppler frequency shift of the first RF signal or the RF jamming signal to simulate the movement of the moving body; A second Doppler controller connected to the decoy antenna to control the Doppler frequency shift of the second RF signal to simulate the decoy; and A simulation inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, further comprising: a third Doppler controller connected to the chaff antenna to control the Doppler frequency shift of the third RF signal to simulate the chaff.
  7. In paragraph 6, The first Doppler controller and the second Doppler controller are, A simulation inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, characterized by controlling the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the RF jamming signal to be greater than the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the second RF signal.
  8. In paragraph 6, The above second Doppler controller and the above third Doppler controller are, A simulation inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, characterized by controlling the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the second RF signal to be greater than the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the third RF signal.
  9. A searcher inspection antenna that outputs a first RF signal to simulate a moving body; a decoy antenna that outputs a second RF signal to simulate a decoy radiated or reflected from the moving body; a chaff antenna that outputs a third RF signal to simulate chaff radiated or reflected from the moving body; a first signal generator connected to the searcher inspection antenna to generate the first RF signal and an RF jamming signal; a second signal generator connected to the decoy antenna to generate the second RF signal; a third signal generator connected to the chaff antenna to generate the third RF signal; a first Doppler controller connected to the searcher inspection antenna to control the Doppler frequency shift of the first RF signal or the RF jamming signal to simulate the movement of the moving body; a second Doppler controller connected to the decoy antenna to control the Doppler frequency shift of the second RF signal to simulate the decoy; and a controller connected to the chaff antenna to control the Doppler frequency shift of the third RF signal to simulate the chaff. In a method of operation performed in a device including a third Doppler controller, The above-mentioned antenna for checking the explorer outputs the first RF signal; and A method of operation of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, comprising the step of the above-mentioned seeker inspection antenna outputting the above-mentioned RF jamming signal after outputting the above-mentioned first RF signal.
  10. In Paragraph 9, After the above-mentioned explorer inspection antenna outputs the first RF signal, the above-mentioned decoy antenna outputs the second RF signal; and A method of operation of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, characterized by further including the step of, after the seeker inspection antenna outputs the first RF signal, the chaff antenna outputs the third RF signal.
  11. In Paragraph 10, The above first Doppler controller and the above second Doppler controller, A method of operation of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, further comprising the step of controlling the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the RF jamming signal to be greater than the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the second RF signal.
  12. In Paragraph 10, The above second Doppler controller and the above third Doppler controller, A method of operation of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker, further comprising the step of controlling the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the second RF signal to be greater than the magnitude of the Doppler shift of the third RF signal.

Description

SIMULATION INSPECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING ELECTRONIC WARFARE PERFORMANCE OF RF SEEKER IN AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES The present invention relates to a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of a seeker and a method of operating the same. The content described in this section merely provides background information regarding the present embodiment and does not constitute prior art. The conventional system inspection method for domestic guided missile RF seekers involved driving a target-simulating antenna with a motor so that the seeker would track the target antenna via RF frequencies. This method was primarily applied only to stationary targets, such as ships, land radars, and buildings, and the target was considered to be in a nearly stationary state relative to the missile's relative velocity. However, with the development of Boramae, the development of domestic air-to-air guided missiles is scheduled, and RF seekers are being considered as the primary option. The target of an air-to-air guided missile is an enemy aircraft, which has dynamic movements in the air and needs to be able to overcome electronic warfare (jamming, decoys, chaff, etc.) situations. Therefore, conventional methods for checking RF seekers cannot effectively simulate the dynamic movements of targets and electronic warfare, and thus have limitations in checking essential performance capabilities of RF seekers, such as anti-jamming and deception exclusion. The present invention proposes a new system inspection method to solve these problems. Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating a conventional explorer inspection method. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of an air-to-air guided missile RF seeker according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of an air-to-air guided missile RF seeker according to another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the operation method of a simulated inspection device for checking the electronic warfare performance of an air-to-air guided missile RF seeker according to one embodiment of the present invention. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. The advantages and features of the present invention, and the methods for achieving them, will become clear by referring to the embodiments described below in detail together with the attached drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below but may be implemented in various different forms. These embodiments are provided merely to ensure that the disclosure of the present invention is complete and to fully inform those skilled in the art of the scope of the invention, and the present invention is defined only by the scope of the claims. Unless otherwise defined, all terms used in this specification (including technical and scientific terms) may be used in a meaning that is commonly understood by those skilled in the art to which the present invention belongs. Furthermore, terms defined in commonly used dictionaries are not to be interpreted ideally or excessively unless explicitly and specifically defined otherwise. The terms used in this application are used merely to describe specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the invention. Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. In this application, terms such as “have,” “may have,” “include,” or “may include” are intended to indicate the existence of the features, numbers, steps, actions, components, parts, or combinations thereof described in the specification, and should be understood as not precluding the existence or addition of one or more other features, numbers, steps, actions, components, parts, or combinations thereof. Terms including ordinal numbers, such as “second,” “first,” etc., may be used to describe various components, but said components are not limited by said terms. The above terms are used solely for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another. For example, without departing from the scope of the present invention, the second component may be named the first component, and similarly, the first component may be named the second component. The term "and/or" includes a combination of a plurality of related described items or any of a plurality of related described items. In this specification, identification symbols (e.g., a, b, c, etc.) for each step are used for convenience of explanation and do not indicate the order of the steps; the steps may occur differently from the specified order unless the context clearly indicates a specific order. That is, the steps may occur in the same order as specified,