KR-20260065599-A - Maneging Excluded Currency System

Abstract

The Max Server calculates the appropriate indirect investment ratio.

Inventors

• 박성준

Assignees

• 박성준

Dates

Publication Date

20260508

Application Date

20260421

Claims (1)

1. A server that internally manages the holdings of collateral securities and receives opinions on fund distribution using the ownership rights to the collateral securities as collateral.

Description

Decentralized Currency System {Maneging Excluded Currency System} Manegging Excluded Currency System Support for the preservation of property value A decentralized server can be implemented. The MEX server internally stores the holdings of collateral securities. The signer enters a proposal for fund management using collateral securities as collateral. The submitted opinions are reflected in the distribution of funds, and the proposer receives a deduction of collateral in the event of fund losses. The value of fund securities is linked to the value of the fund. A. Initial state The server stores the names and public keys of a finite number of signers, and stores the amount of each currency owned by each signer. The server's currency includes fund securities, collateral securities, and transfer securities. It is most efficient when a single currency uniquely fulfills all three roles, and value can be created by distributing these functions across multiple currencies. The fundraisers receive the promised currency. The foreign currency raised is distributed to the operators according to the ratio determined by the first resolution. B. Resolution In the resolution, the fund managers to be in charge of managing the fund and the proportion of the total fund each manager is responsible for are determined. There are first and second resolutions. In the first resolution, the list of managers entrusted with the fund is determined. The ratio of funds managed by the operators decided in the second resolution is determined. The signer can enter a proposal into the server using their voting securities as collateral. A Class 1 proposer may agree to the participation of workers by mentioning them, or oppose them by not mentioning them separately. The server determines whether to allow each operator based on the total fund amount, total collateral share amount, individual consent ratio, etc. The Class 2 proposer proposes whether to trust or distrust a single operator, and the Class 2 resolution determines the proportion of funds managed by the operator. Depending on the server, a Class 2 resolution may be carried out based only on the result of a Class 1 proposal without a Class 2 proposal. The submitted collateral shall be returned in full or in part, or extinguished thereafter, depending on the contents of the proposal, etc. C. Settlement of rewards and fines If damage is caused by the operator due to the proposal, the Class 2 proposers shall compensate first, and if the amount is insufficient, the consenting party shall compensate additionally. The amount of compensation is greater than or equal to the amount of damages. The operator's financial status is determined based on self-reporting and remittance amounts. If the proposal generates a profit for the operator and it is not denied that the profit was obtained even after additional resolution and capital transfer, the prize is paid to the proposer. The input of appropriate suggestions is encouraged through the imposition of such rewards and penalties. In order to successfully carry out an intentional seizure of the fund, one must pass the first resolution on one's own, but even then, due to the proposal of distrust in the second resolution, it is difficult to seize more than the capital used. If assets are underreported, proposers are subject to an obligation to compensate beyond that amount, and it becomes difficult to expect long-term management fees. If assets are overreported, negative proposers may arise and it may be revealed that the report is false, and consequently, it may become difficult to gain support from proposers who wish to avoid fines exceeding the prize money. D. Fund Securities Linkage To guarantee the value of fund securities, the server supports the increase and decrease of the total amount of fund securities. In the event of an increase in volume using foreign currency, the server receives the foreign currency within the server from the signer, sells it to determine its value, issues new fund securities equivalent to that value, and pays them to the signer. The proceeds from the sale are distributed to the operators. In the event of a reduction in foreign currency, the server claims and pays out foreign currency from the operators in proportion to the value of the received fund securities. The foreign currency used in this case must be an internal server currency that the server can verify. Autonomous increase and decrease refer to the adjustment of the volume of fund securities implemented independently by operators by comparing the total value of the fund and the total value of fund securities. When increasing the amount, new fund securities are provided to the managers, and when decreasing the amount, fund securities are collected from the managers and destroyed. The server implements one or more of the two methods above. The following is an example. S1 Fundraising is conducted using gold-backed bills. The currency shall be of three types: A